[Exi-bay-chat] Guns? In Noe Valley? (fwd)
Anton Sherwood
bronto at pobox.com
Fri Jan 30 01:06:15 UTC 2004
Subject: Guns? In Noe Valley? <bang!>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:31:21 -0800
From: Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net>
To: LPSF Discussion List <lpsf-discuss at yahoogroups.com>
CC: George Bennett <noeguns at hotmail.com>
CC: Bay Area Liberty <ba-liberty at yahoogroups.com>
This simultaneously encouraging and infuriating item appeared in the
December/January Noe Valley Voice (pp. 57-58):
"One flyer that got our attention was a notice posted by the Noe Valley
Gun Owners Association" advertising a noon Nov. 29 meeting in Douglass
Park. The flyer also said the group was advocating a gun dealership on
24th Street.
"When the Voice e-mailed the name on the notice (George Bennett at
<noeguns at hotmail.com>), asking if the association was real or just a
premature April Fool's joke, we got this reply:
"'Yes, the organization does exist. We've been around for approximately
five years. We currently maintain an e-mail list of approximately 150
Noe Valley residents who consider themselves members. About two-thirds
of them are males and one-third female. A good half of our members are
homeowners in the neighborhood, married with children of elementary
school age. We've been keeping a low profile since we've been harassed
(as have our kids) by many of our tolerant progressive neighbors,
although I would consider most of our members to be politically
progressive... We estimate that one out of every five homes in Noe
Valley has a firearm on the premises.
"'Our estimate is unscientific,' the writer admits. 'It's just a hunch
based on our members' experiences and conversations with their
neighbors.' Still doubtful, the Voice decided to show up at Douglass
Park (both Upper and Lower) at the appointed time on Nov. 29. The gun
owners may have been there, but if they were, they were cleverly
disguised as dog walkers, kids, and trees.
"Maybe all of those pistol-packin' ladies and gentlemen could sponsor a
seminar at Alvarado School on gun safety. It might help allay the fears
of the other 80 percent of us who think the sooner we ban those dang
things (except in the hands of what the Second Amendment calls 'a
well-regulated militia'), the closer we will be to joining the
civilized societies of the world where guns are not tolerated as
private instruments of lethal violence."
It seems to me that the paper has given us an opening. Having
suggested a gun safety class at Alvarado School, if someone (either
George's group or the SF Pink Pistols, or both) were to sponsor such a
class, it would be difficult for them to refuse to publicize it for us.
Perhaps they could even be hit up for a free ad, or to make the paper
an event co-sponsor.
Yours in liberty,
<<< Starchild >>>
Outreach Director, Libertarian Party of San Francisco
Candidate for School Board
More information about the exi-bay-chat
mailing list