<html>
<body>
At 10:41 PM 7/9/2005, Perry E. Metzger wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">> Geoethical nanotechnology
is the development and implementation under a<br>
> global regulatory framework of machines capable of assembling
molecules<br><br>
Unless I see evidence to the contrary, I'm afraid I'll be rather<br>
suspicious that the word "Geoethical" and the phrase
"global<br>
regulatory framework" are not biocompatible with my lunch, so
tuning<br>
in to this "webcast" might cause me to lose it.<br><br>
It is sad to see people who once wrote eloquently about libertarian<br>
approaches to the world giving even lip service to words like
"global<br>
regulatory framework".</blockquote><br>
I'm not sure if she (Martine Rothblatt) ever wrote about libertarian
approaches to the world. Where do you find this inconsistence
Perry?<br><br>
And, why would you hang your future so tightly to any one political
theory when no one political theory is substantially adequate to
intelligently address the rate of change and the effects of change and
how the world can function in order to protect individuality and
freedom.<br><br>
If you are referring to Max, and perhaps this is a long shot on my part,
but if you are, then you would find that his eloquence has evolved, not
declined.<br><br>
Natasha<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<dl>
<dd><font size=2><a href="http://www.natasha.cc/">Natasha
</a><a href="http://www.natasha.cc/">Vita-More</a>
<dd>Cultural Strategist, Designer
<dd>Studies of the Future, University of Houston <br><br>
</font>
<dd><font face="Times New Roman, Times" size=1><i>Knowledge is the most
democratic source of power.</i> Alvin Toffler
<dd><i>Random acts of kindness... </i>Anne
Herbe</font><font face="Times New Roman, Times">t<br><br></font>
</dl></body>
</html>