[extropy-chat] Re: Self replication again (was MARS: Because
eugen at leitl.org
Sun Apr 18 19:45:56 UTC 2004
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 12:12:36PM -0500, Stephen J. Van Sickle wrote:
> Hmmm....then this brings up the question of how one safely and cheaply
> disposes of used/defective/outdated devices. Ideally you would want to
There's value in building failure-tolerant, gracefully degrading nanoware.
Outdated, yes, if we're arguing in tracking fitness in a co-evolutionary
> close the material loop and turn it into feedstock, but as you say it is
> not obvious that this is simply an inverse operation of construction.
Thermal utilization, pyrolysisis, hydrogenation, disassembly. There's a
bandwidth of options available.
> Worst case, I suppose, would be some sort of high pressure and
> temperature decomposition, but the costs would be significant,
If it's passivated (sapphire or silica-coated) CHNOPS organics, just make a
big heap of it, and burn it up. Pyrolysis is a more controlled version of
above. Using catalyst and hydrogen lets you retain most of fixated
In space, situation is obviously different.
> especially in comparison to the cost of manufacture. However, it seems
> a necessary area to investigate when trying to evaluate the cost or
> effectiveness of large scale MNT.
Right here and now, it's a complete waste of time. Let's figure out how to
build the damned things first.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the extropy-chat