[extropy-chat] The Inevitability of Universal Immortality
Hara Ra
harara at sbcglobal.net
Mon Dec 6 16:45:16 UTC 2004
Each "synapse" is a small emulator intended to handle these things. In the
worst case, such an emulated synapse would be about the same volume as the
original. I did not say all 'synapses' were identical, was only doing a
volume estimate. I do my best to say what I mean, but I cannot handle
assumptions provided by others. So thanks, now you are updated.
When nanoscanner examines synapse, would set up model parameters from data
therefrom.
At 06:15 AM 12/6/2004, you wrote:
>At 08:56 PM 12/5/04 -0800, you Hara Ra wrote:
>In NanoSystems, Drexler using a mechanocomputing model
> >estimates that less than 1ml is needed to create a human equivalent
> >computer. now, .001 cubic micron per synaptic
> >equivalent, >or 0.4 milliliters.
>
>Each synapse is an enormously complex system: hundreds of vesicles
>containing a multitude of different neurotransmitters at presynaptic side
>and thousands of different receptors and innumerable subtypes of receptors
>at postsynaptic side with thousands of various possible substates for every
>connection. Not to mention dizzy cell machinery and chemo apparatus of
>environment. Even if a final result of interaction is just a definite
>postsynaptic potential you cannot emulate a synapse in a naive
>"wire-to-wire" setup unless you introduce external controlling unit that
>simulates (currently) unfathomable innards and functional repertoire for
>each synapse.
>
>Best!
>
>Gennady
>Simferopol Crimea Ukraine
>
>_______________________________________________
>extropy-chat mailing list
>extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
==================================
= Hara Ra (aka Gregory Yob) =
= harara at sbcglobal.net =
= Alcor North Cryomanagement =
= Alcor Advisor to Board =
= 831 429 8637 =
==================================
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list