[extropy-chat] Re: John Wright Finds God
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Sun Dec 12 23:21:46 UTC 2004
A most interesting post!
On Dec 9, 2004, at 10:10 AM, john-c-wright at sff.net wrote:
> Nicholas Anthony MacDonald says, in reply to Mr. Albright:
>> Except Robert Wright's search for "ultimate meaning" is of a very
>> different
> character than John Wright. Robert Wright is engaged in a
> philosophical
> "search", while John just happened to have a near death experience and
> decide
> that Jesus was to blame.
>
> Well, this sentiment is accurate (my conversion was not the product of
> philosophical rumination) but the characterization is slightly
> inaccurate. Mr.
> McDonald is not to blame for assuming I had a near death experience and
> "decided Jesus was to blame", since my description to Greg West about
> the event
> was rather coy.
>
> I did not “decide” anything. My reaction to a blinding revelation was
> something more spontaneous than rationally choosing which falsifiable
> theory
> best fit the observed and empirical facts. It was more like falling
> in love.
>
I know that experience. It makes most falling in love we generally
know about rather pale.
> You must forgive me for being close-mouthed about the details when
> speaking to
> strangers. It is my own inadequacy that stills my pen. An event
> beyond human
> understanding cannot be described in human words to those who have no
> referent
> experiences, no frame, in which to understand it. If you wonder how I,
> as a
> human, could have witnessed an event beyond human understanding, I can
> only hint
> that we humans are not what we think we are. The truth of the matter
> is far
> more glorious than we suspect.
I very much understand and I do have useable referents. Yet I also
have to ask what the worth of these experiences is. As you may know,
certain types of epilepsy lead to near continuous mystical visions and
knowings of tremendous power. Some types of brain stimulation also
appear capable of generating such experience at least in part.
Psychedelics are famous for giving some very similar experiences
although to be perfectly frank, my mystical expriences of a few years
ago were quite different from anything I experienced in my misspent
psychedelic youth all too long ago.
>
> My question to my respected fellow atheists (if I may so call you,
> for I have
> only departed your company recently) is this: what does an honest and
> rational
> man do when he has a supernatural experience?
I don't know. I only know what I did. The first such experience
utterly floored me. My entire idea of what life was about and what
was important and who/what I was changed. So much so that I saw
nothing to be done but to fully live and surrender to what I had seen.
I was ready to become a full-time religious although what I had
experienced did not fit so well with the dogma of any religion that had
such vocations. Fortunately (or not) there were enough roadblocks
between me and such a life that I had a considerable cooling off
period. At the end of that time I was left with the only
"non-supernatural" explanation being that the human mind/heart is
capable of layers of integration, experience, emoting, insight far
beyond what I thought. But in the end what did this great wonderful
experience of utter Love and knowing everything from within everything
and from within That in which everything was actually say about what
is true? Too many critical questions were left hanging. It took
some time but I put it aside at least tentatively. Eventually I more
or less decided that such an extraordinary interrupting experience not
backed up by other evidence was not to be trusted at face value.
Over time I became very un-enamored of all the credulity that
unfortunately seemed nearly inseparable from "The Path" or the walking
of it. I gradually "lost my faith" even backed by Experience.
But it was not easy. It was and even today sometimes is an incredible
internal struggle. I very much wanted to stay with the Bliss - the
greatest joy, happiness and peace I have ever known. But I could not
help wondering if it was all it appeared to be.
Then, just when I was back to my naturalistic self and worldview, I had
another Experience, that integrated many of the things I thought
opposed to the meaning of the first experience. I saw the
inevitability of God and many different aspects of what spirituality is
and why it is important. I experienced a Grand Integration of all I
knew and cared about. I experienced sheaves of sermons of all the
implications and how they could be shared to heal the world.
As I was happily and atheist by then and thought i had got far away
from "that stuff" this was very, very distressing and not at all what I
wanted. Yet there it was. It was so powerful that the truth of it
boomed out of every cell of my body. This one dropped me to my
knees!
Because of the insights I had received I was sorely tempted to
immediately go out and start sharing these with any who I could get to
listen. Yet I had just signed up for a very important and
interesting project that I very much wanted to do even though it was
very "mundane" in comparison. So again I had a cooling off period.
This vision was very different in that I saw the "Supernatural" in
terms of the "Natural". I saw why God would come to be if God did not
exist already. I saw that if God came to be then God must transcend
space-time. If in any conditions ever God could come to be then God
Is. I saw how naturalistic science would lead to ever accelerating
technological change that would require we ourselves to transcend our
evolutionary programming or perish. I saw that it led directly (if
succesful) to Intelligence Augmentation and the creation of every
greater Mind. I saw that the most successful direction of that
transcendence over our evolution was very similar to the directions for
transcendence of the "ego" or "natural man". I saw how the age of
Information would push us beyond our selfishness if we are to survive
and thrive at all. Enough for now. I cannot do it justice in this
space.
>
> Does he, like Scrooge, claim Marlowe's ghost is a bit of beef, a
> product of bad
> digestion? Does he accuse himself of hallucination rather than
> entertain the
> opinion that his axioms might be mistaken? Occam's razor, plus a
> modicum of
> intellectual integrity, would seem to militate against this assumption.
>
When confronted with an experience seriously out-of-band with
everything else one must first asks whether this experience is an
aberration. This is only reasonable. It is said (I wouldn't know)
that the high from heroin is the most glorious experience. But that it
is glorious does not by itself says it is worth pursuing or that those
fabulous feelings/insights/perceptions have real meaning. Our feelings
are not normally taken as valid tools of cognition. Does then a
veritable tsunami of Feeling automatically mean we are low if we doubt
and question its meaning?
> I ask this in all seriousness. What does one do when overwhelming
> evidence
> suddenly breaks in on you that your entire system of the world, so
> carefully
> constructed by materialist rational philosophy over many years of
> painstaking
> thought, is utterly wrong and discredited? Pretend it did not happen?
>
Is it "overwhelming evidence" or overwhelming Experience of Meaning,
Love, Truth, Power, Knowing? Why this over-the-top Experience but
without filling in the thought and reason and questions fully? Why
this occasional perfect spiritual storm but not solid understanding?
Why would the Divine arrange things like this? Why have the purported
Truth go gamboling among us to occasionally knock one of us who seek it
or not flat on our ass? Why not share this awesome truth of the
way-it-really-is across the spectrum with all human beings? Why this
capricious hide-and-seek and cosmic peek-a-boo?
This looks deeply suspicious to me. And yet please understand that I
to this day feel like a lout to say so after the Depth of what I have
experienced.
- samantha
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list