[extropy-chat] Puzzle - Short Tale
Spike
spike66 at comcast.net
Sat Feb 7 07:59:59 UTC 2004
> Spike wrote:
> > I found an old notebook in which I used to do mathematical
> > puzzles. I had found in a commentary that 153 is the smallest
...
> >
> > 8th: 24678050, 24678051, 88593477
> >
.
> > complete loss for how. OH NO I've grown stuuuupiiiiid! {8-[
>
> Here's a quick (3-minute) algorithm written in Frink (a
> programming language of my own design):...
Ja, the puzzle is that this algorithm is way too
slow to have been done on a 3.2 mhz computer. It
would have taken months to get thru the 8th powers.
Robert wrote:
>Reviewing recent comments by Alan and Spike -- you folks had
>way too much time on your hands...
So very true.
But aint it grand? {8^D I just love having time for
reprehensible intellectual idleness. {8-] Its what
I want to do with eternity if I manage to get myself
uploaded: sit and think. What else can a program do?
As it turns out, I rediscovered the algorithm today
and nailed the rest up thru 14:
numbers that equal the sum of the 9th power of their digits:
146511208,
912985153,
472335975,
534494836
sum of the 10th powers: 4679307774
sum of 11th powers: 32164049650,
32164049651
40028394225,
42678290603,
44708635679,
49388550606,
82693916578
94204591914,
12th: aint none!
13th: 564240140138
14th: 281164403359967
Clearly I didn't do this brute force method, computers
havent been in existence that long.
{8^D spike (the cheerful idler)
ps if anyone can think of an application for this
silliness, do suggest and we can apply for a
software patent together, assuming you do not
consider it a sin to patent an algorithm. This
one is clever if I say so myself. {8-] s
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list