[extropy-chat] Schrodinger's Black Cat
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Thu Jul 22 18:13:00 UTC 2004
or do I mean Schrodinger's Cat's Black Hole?
or Schrodinger's Entangled Cat?
< In his new calculation, Dr. Hawking said that because of quantum
uncertainty, one could never be sure from a distance that a black hole had
really formed. There is no way to discriminate between a real black hole
and an apparent one.
In the latter case an event horizon, the putative point of last return,
could appear to form and then unravel; in that case the so-called Hawking
radiation that came back out would not be completely random but would have
subtle correlations and thus could carry information about what was inside.
According to quantum theory, both possibilities - a real black hole and an
apparent one - coexist and contribute to the final answer. The contribution
of the no-black-hole possibilities is great enough to suffice to allow
information to escape, Dr. Hawking argued. >
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/22/science/22hawk.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=
Damien Broderick
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list