[extropy-chat] Petals around the rose
Jef Allbright
jef at jefallbright.net
Sun Jun 6 15:51:07 UTC 2004
David Lubkin wrote:
> Harvey wrote:
>
>> I frequently have problems with puzzles that give three numbers and
>> want the next in the sequence, because I can often see multiple
>> different sequences that would start with the same four numbers. I
>> also have problems with a set of four words and choosing which one
>> doesn't belong. Often there are different groups of the three that
>> exclude a different fourth. The devisors of these puzzles usually
>> have one obvious answer in mind, but there are often others they
>> didn't consider.
>
>
> Hence my father's conjecture that an IQ test cannot accurately measure
> the intelligence of someone smarter than the author of the test.
>
> A better way to handle such situations -- sequences, analogies (a is
> to b as c is to ?) -- is to accept any answer but require the testee
> to provide the basis for the answer.
>
> The sequence problems are the most idiotic. Given any finite sequence
> S(1:n) and any number m, one can devise a formula that results in
> S(1:n+1), where S(n+1) = m. The problem becomes guessing which, out of
> an infinity of formulas, would be thought most obvious or elegant.
>
> (Actually, it's worse than that -- there are an infinite number of
> possible m's and, for each m, there are an infinite number of
> formulas, since one can always add pairs of operations that cancel
> each other.)
>
This poses an interesting question: What is it about the nature of
human intelligence that certain people can come up with large sets of
possibilities but have difficulty filtering these possibilities and
applying them to fit the bigger picture? Likewise, bigger picture
people seem to be at some disadvantage when it comes to generating large
sets of possibilities. These personality differences are quite
noticeable within teams of scientists and engineers. Could it be
related to Myers-Briggs S vs N type?
Back to the Petals Aound The Rose puzzle, I observed that I may have
had a slight conceptual advantage due to my Japanese language
background, where the language does not differentiate between singular
and plural.
- Jef
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list