[extropy-chat] Enlightenment and the election

[Mike Lorrey]

I nominate this post for Post of the Month.

--- "J. Andrew Rogers" <andrew at ceruleansystems.com> wrote:

> Brent Neal wrote:
> > You know, if the smart folks tend to preferentially vote for
> someone,
> > I'd consider that carefully.  Even though our status as educated
> seems
> > to attract disdain from you, my experience is that we tend to think
> > more about our own choices, and not what our preacher tells us to
> do. 
> 
> 
> There is no evidence in this particular election that the smart folks
> preferentially voted any one way.  Most self-described big city
> liberals
> are as provincial and poorly educated as your average flyover country
> resident, they just choose to let their ignorance shine in different
> areas, and tend to believe in the myth of their intellectual skills a
> little more.  Just because you like a different flavor of Kool-Aid
> does
> not change the fact that you are still drinking Kool-Aid.  There is
> no
> shortage of tools and frauds on both sides, and being trendy or
> fashionable is not an indication of credibility.
> 
> 
> In practice, blue state folks are just as ignorant of science,
> mathematics, and culture as red state folks.  They just specialize in
> different sub-areas when it comes to ignorance.  If you do not
> recognize
> this (no matter which side you claim to be on), then you are
> precisely
> the type of person I am talking about.
> 
> I do find that some stereotypes tend to be true.  Red-Staters tend to
> be
> historians and tend to view things in a historical context, whereas I
> find that most Blue-Staters have an appalling lack of knowledge of
> history.  Blue-Staters tend to be more ethnically worldly than
> Red-Staters, though not to the extent that many Blue-Staters appear
> to
> believe.  Red-Staters are more religious on average, but not that
> much
> and not in any way that makes a difference, since Blue-Staters have
> their own quasi-religious belief systems that Red-Staters generally
> do
> not share.
> 
> I tend to find the religious right-wing more tolerable than the
> "intellectual" left-wing in that the religious right does not try to
> make any claim as to the superiority of their own brain power as
> individuals (that is reserved for god), whereas I've found that the
> intellectual left tends to take the superiority of their thinking
> skills
> and knowledge to be axiomatic (and hence whatever garbage may result
> from it).  Appeals to god are so much cleaner and pleasant in
> comparison.
> 
> I don't really fall under either side, and have lived in both "parts"
> of
> the country most of my life.  Claiming clear intellectual superiority
> for team you voted for is hubris born of ignorance.
> 
> 
> j. andrew rogers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
> 


=====
Mike Lorrey
Vice-Chair, 2nd District, Libertarian Party of NH
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
                                      -William Pitt (1759-1806) 
Blog: http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=Sadomikeyism


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com