[extropy-chat] 'Unskilled jobs to go in 10 years'

[Samantha Atkins]

Damien Broderick wrote:

>
> Obviously it's *not* acceptable in either case unless provisions are 
> put in place to enable the neighbor's transition to a new job (if such 
> exists or is even possible--and it won't be possible if 
> automation/nanotech is broadly effective or once the whole world is 
> job-leveled) or to obtain some of the benefits of the new arrangements 
> (by being a stakeholder, say; ideally in many different 
> enterprises--which, in the limit, might be done efficiently via 
> enlightened government, or co-ops, or the Mafia, or churches, or the 
> Extropy Investment Fund, whatever).


Extropy Investment Fund sounds like a great idea.   Is anyone setting 
such up? 

- samantha