[extropy-chat] More on Evolution

[Trend Ologist]

If snakes are a form of 'backward evolution', then so
too could hominids eventually regress, which means
flaws do exist in the framework.



 --- Kevin Freels <megaquark at hotmail.com> wrote: 
> It still remains within the basic framework. The
> ability to evolve some sort
> of mechanism to control evolution would itself be
> the result of natural
> selection. Evolution does not have "flaws" in the
> framework, but like
> anything, it occasionally needs to have the details
> tweaked. Gould's "The
> Structure of Evolutionary Theory" brings up many of
> these points.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kurt Schoedel" <kurt at metatechnica.com>
> To: <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:32 PM
> Subject: [extropy-chat] More on Evolution
> 
> 
> > The creationists are correct that the currently
> accepted theory of
> > evolution has flaws in it. Their problem is that
> they think that the
> > only alternative explanation is their religious
> psycho-pathology.
> >
> > The website: www.darwingenome.info
> >
> > offers a potential alternative explanation of
> evolution.
> >
> > Kurt Schoedel
> > MetaTechnica
> > _______________________________________________
> > extropy-chat mailing list
> > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> >
>
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
> >
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>  


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com