[extropy-chat] POLITICS: 537 Economists Criticize Bush and Kerry
Mike Lorrey
mlorrey at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 15 14:04:16 UTC 2004
Saw the other day that the fellow who just won this years Nobel in
economics says the Bush tax cuts were not big enough.
--- Hal Finney <hal at finney.org> wrote:
> In recent political news, 537 economists have blasted the policies
> of Bush and Kerry, for both raising and lowering taxes. The helpful
> economists, who include 8 Nobel laureates, also advised the
> candidates
> to both increase and reduce government social programs.
>
> See <http://www.openlettertothepresident.org/> and
>
<http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/release_bc04_economists.html>.
>
> Well, of course this advice did not all come from the same people.
> Some
> of them criticized Kerry and some Bush. Neither praised any
> candidates.
> (Actually I didn't look to see whether anyone signed both letters.)
>
> Consider that these people are among the greatest experts in the
> world on
> economic topics, that they have devoted their entire professional
> lives,
> countless hours of intensive study, and intensive intellectual
> scrutiny
> and debate to these issues. And yet they come to diametrially
> opposite
> conclusions.
>
> Given this reality, what hope have any of us in deciding what is the
> truth here? Should taxes be raised or lowered? Entitlement programs
> revised up or down? If study and intelligence would lead to answers
> to
> these questions, why do the people who have applied both, to the
> highest
> degree possible, still have such sharp disagreements?
>
> And yet, I'll bet many politically oriented readers, especially those
> who have pledged their allegiance to an ideological system, believe
> that they actually know the truth of the matter. They think that
> they,
> with their cursory and amateur levels of study, know these issues
> better
> than hundreds of hardworking, brilliant experts. Or perhaps,
> prompted by
> ideological certainty, they will comfort themselves that those
> hundreds
> of experts on the other side are evil, wicked liars.
>
> I'm not sure what lesson to draw from this, other than to recognize
> that
> the world is a more complicated place than we sometimes let ourselves
> believe. And perhaps, we should keep in mind that even those who
> disagree
> with us may have just as good reasons for their beliefs as we do for
> ours.
>
> Hal
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>
=====
Mike Lorrey
Vice-Chair, 2nd District, Libertarian Party of NH
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
-William Pitt (1759-1806)
Blog: http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=Sadomikeyism
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list