[extropy-chat] funky frink function

scerir scerir at libero.it
Wed Oct 27 06:45:41 UTC 2004


> To: .9 c
> Result: 
> 0.035648925264461071933

But why just .9 c ? 

Lucien Hardy has already shown that the first 
signal principle of SR does not work if we 
insert a particle and an antiparticle in a 
peculiar (double, or nested) Mack-Zehnder 
interferometer. According to Hardy (and David 
Bohm, and the Geneva quantum optics group, and 
many others) it is well possible that
there is a - cosmic - preferred reference frame.

Abner Shimony introduced the expression
'passion-at-a-distance' for a subtle form of
nonlocality, namely that it is possible to
think in terms of FTL causation between two
space-like separated events. It is only the
'uncontrollability' resulting from indeterminism
that stands in the way of FTL uncontrollable
communication via 'passion-at-a-distance'.
So this kind of FTL communication, or FTL 
causation, actually is an 'uncontrollable 
nonlocality', which produces no conflict with 
the first signal principle of SR, just because 
of that 'uncontrollability'.

Evidently a cosmic preferred reference frame
would - should - avoid causal paradoxes.

http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0408153
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0410160
- Abner Shimony: 'Controllable and Uncontrollable
Non-Locality'in 'Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
in the Light of New Technology', Tokyo, Japan
Physical Society, (Kamefuchi et al. eds), 1984;
- Abner Shimony: 'Events and Processes in the
Quantum World', in 'Quantum Concepts in Space and
Time', (Penrose and Isham eds), Oxford U.P., 1986.

(Frink calculator already knows all that!).

s :-) 

In the early days of World War II, physicists around the world were 
intently watching the pages of the Physical Review, waiting for 
updates on one of the century's greatest revelations: fission, the 
splitting of an atom's nucleus accompanied by a prodigious release 
of energy. But they waited in vain. Because of fears that Germany 
would use American research to pursue an atomic weapon, the 
Physical Review agreed to withhold reports of significant advances. 
It was not until several months after an atomic bomb exploded over 
Nagasaki, Japan, that Phys. Rev. published the paper announcing the 
discovery of plutonium, the material used in that bomb. Physicist 
Abraham Pais later called the journal's silence on the subject "the 
most important nonevent in the history of the Physical Review." 
(G. T. Seaborg et al., Phys. Rev. 69, 366; G. T. Seaborg et al., 
Phys. Rev. 69, 367; and J. W. Kennedy et al., Phys. Rev. 70, 555)
Links to the papers: 
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PR/v69/p366/s2
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PR/v69/p367/s1
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PR/v70/p555
Focus story at http://focus.aps.org/story/v14/st17






More information about the extropy-chat mailing list