[extropy-chat] FWD (PvT) STEYN: 'Peace Mom's' marraige a metaphor for Dems

Terry W. Colvin fortean1 at mindspring.com
Mon Aug 22 20:47:01 UTC 2005


http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn21.html

'Peace Mom's' marriage a metaphor for Dems

August 21, 2005

BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

Cindy Sheehan's son Casey died in Sadr City last year, and that fact 
is supposed to put her beyond reproach. For as the New York Times' 
Maureen Dowd informed us: ''The moral authority of parents who bury 
children killed in Iraq is absolute."

Really? Well, what about those other parents who've buried children 
killed in Iraq? There are, sadly, hundreds of them: They honor their 
loved ones' service to the nation, and so they don't make the news. 
There's one Cindy Sheehan, and she's on TV 'round the clock. Because, 
if you're as heavily invested as Dowd in the notion that those 
"killed in Iraq" are "children," then Sheehan's status as grieving 
matriarch is a bonanza.

They're not children in Iraq; they're grown-ups who made their own 
decision to join the military. That seems to be difficult for the 
left to grasp. Ever since America's all-adult, all-volunteer army 
went into Iraq, the anti-war crowd have made a sustained effort to 
characterize them as "children." If a 13-year-old wants to have an 
abortion, that's her decision and her parents shouldn't get a 
look-in. If a 21-year-old wants to drop to the broadloom in Bill 
Clinton's Oval Office, she's a grown woman and free to do what she 
wants. But, if a 22- or 25- or 37-year-old is serving his country 
overseas, he's a wee "child" who isn't really old enough to know what 
he's doing.

I get many e-mails from soldiers in Iraq, and they sound a lot more 
grown-up than most Ivy League professors and certainly than Maureen 
Dowd, who writes like she's auditioning for a minor supporting role 
in ''Sex And The City.''

The infantilization of the military promoted by the left is deeply 
insulting to America's warriors but it suits the anti-war crowd's 
purposes. It enables them to drone ceaselessly that "of course" they 
"support our troops," because they want to stop these poor confused 
moppets from being exploited by the Bush war machine.

I resisted writing about "Mother Sheehan" (as one leftie has proposed 
designating her), as it seemed obvious that she was at best a little 
unhinged by grief and at worst mentally ill. It's one thing to mourn 
a son's death and even to question the cause for which he died, but 
quite another to roar that he was "murdered by the Bush crime family."

Also: "You tell me the truth. You tell me that my son died for oil. 
You tell me that my son died to make your friends rich. You tell me 
my son died to spread the cancer of Pax Americana . . . You get 
America out of Iraq, you get Israel out of Palestine."

And how about this? "America has been killing people on this 
continent since it was started. This country is not worth dying for." 
That was part of her warm-up act for a speech by Lynne Stewart, the 
"activist" lawyer convicted of conspiracy for aiding the terrorists 
convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

You can see why Lynne's grateful to Sheehan. But why is Elizabeth 
Edwards sending out imploring letters headlined "Support Cindy 
Sheehan's Right To Be Heard"? The politics of this isn't difficult: 
The more Cindy Sheehan is heard the more obvious it is she's thrown 
her lot in with kooks most Americans would give a wide berth to.

Don't take my word for it, ask her family. Casey Sheehan's 
grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins put out the following 
statement:

"The Sheehan Family lost our beloved Casey in the Iraq War and we 
have been silently, respectfully grieving. We do not agree with the 
political motivations and publicity tactics of Cindy Sheehan. She now 
appears to be promoting her own personal agenda and notoriety at the 
expense of her son's good name and reputation. The rest of the 
Sheehan Family supports the troops, our country, and our President, 
silently, with prayer and respect."

Ah, well, they're not immediate family, so they lack Cindy's "moral 
authority." But how about Casey's father, Pat Sheehan? Last Friday, 
in Solano County Court, Casey's father Pat Sheehan filed for divorce. 
As the New York Times explained Cindy's "separation," "Although she 
and her estranged husband are both Democrats, she said she is more 
liberal than he is, and now, more radicalized."

Toppling Saddam and the Taliban (Mrs. Sheehan opposes U.S. 
intervention in Afghanistan, too), destroying al-Qaida's training 
camps and helping 50 million Muslims on the first steps to free 
societies aren't worth the death of a single soldier. But Cindy 
Sheehan's hatred of Bush is worth the death of her marriage. Watching 
her and her advanced case of Bush Derangement Syndrome on TV, I feel 
the way I felt about that mentally impaired Aussie concert pianist 
they got to play at the Oscars a few years.

Yet in the wreckage of Pat and Cindy Sheehan's marriage there is 
surely a lesson for the Democratic Party. As Cindy says, they're both 
Democrats, but she's "more liberal" and "more radicalized." There are 
a lot of less liberal and less radicalized Dems out there: They're 
soft-left-ish on health care and the environment and education and so 
forth; many have doubts about the war, but they love their country, 
they have family in the military, and they don't believe in 
dishonoring American soldiers to make a political point. The problem 
for the Democratic Party is that the Cindys are now the loudest 
voice: Michael Moore, Howard Dean, Moveon.org, and Air America, the 
flailing liberal radio network distracting attention from its own 
financial scandals by flying down its afternoon host Randi Rhodes to 
do her show live from Camp Casey. The last time I heard Miss Rhodes 
she was urging soldiers called up for Iraq to refuse to go -- i.e., 
to desert.

On unwatched Sunday talk shows, you can still stumble across the 
occasional sane, responsible Dem. But, in the absence of any serious 
intellectual attempt to confront their long-term decline, all the 
energy on the left is with the fringe. The Democratic Party is a 
coalition of Pat Sheehans and Cindy Sheehans, and the noisier the 
Cindys get the more estranged the Pats are likely to feel.

Sorry about that, but, if Mrs. Sheehan can insist her son's corpse be 
the determining factor in American policy on Iraq, I don't see why 
her marriage can't be a metaphor for the state of the Democratic 
Party.

Casey Sheehan was a 21-year old man when he enlisted in 2000. He 
re-enlisted for a second tour, and he died after volunteering for a 
rescue mission in Sadr City. Mrs. Sheehan says she wishes she'd 
driven him to Canada, though that's not what he would have wished, 
and it was his decision.

His mother has now left Crawford, officially because her mother has 
had a stroke, but promising to return. I doubt she will. Perhaps deep 
down she understands she's a woman whose grief curdled into a 
narcissistic rage, and most Americans will not follow where she's 
gone -- to the wilder shores of anti-Bush, anti-war, anti-Iraq, 
anti-Afghanistan, anti-Israel, anti-American paranoia. Casey 
Sheehan's service was not the act of a child. A shame you can't say 
the same about his mom's new friends.



-- 
"Only a zit on the wart on the heinie of progress." Copyright 1992, Frank Rice


Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1 at mindspring.com >
     Alternate: < fortean1 at msn.com >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: * Fortean Times * Mystic's Haven * TLCB *
      U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program
------------
Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List
   TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org > [Southeast Asia
veterans, Allies, CIA/NSA, and "steenkeen" contractors are welcome.]




More information about the extropy-chat mailing list