[extropy-chat] FWD (UFO UpDate) Supernatural Ideas Do Not Fit With Science
Terry W. Colvin
fortean1 at mindspring.com
Mon Dec 12 21:28:08 UTC 2005
Source: The Clarion-Ledger - Reno, Nevada, USA
http://tinyurl.com/dntok
December 11, 2005
Con: Supernatural Ideas Do Not Fit With Science
By John Davis
Special to The Clarion-Ledger
The intelligent design movement aims to bring supernatural
explanations into science. But supernatural forces would be
beyond the ability of scientists to control, repeat and predict.
ID seeks nothing less than to undo the 400 years since Galileo
developed science's methods.
Consider the consequences: Do we want "supernatural science" in
NASA or the Centers for Disease Control?
High school classrooms are the battleground now and it could
happen. As part of embracing ID, the Kansas school board has
specifically mandated that natural explanations may not be
necessary in science classes! Similar language was drafted by
Phillip Johnson, adviser to the ID think-tank the Discovery
Institute, for the 2001 "No Child Left Behind" bill. It was
removed, but ID is marching on.
The vehicle for advancing intelligent design is the crusade to
get creationism into the schools. According to the movement's
"wedge" manifesto, the real goal is breathtakingly greater — to
overthrow "materialistic science" altogether!
ID creation scientists are different from those seeking proofs
of a literal Genesis. It is a tenet of the ID movement that the
designer could be in a UFO. The ID designer could be any deity
or a committee. Hence, the Raelian "flying saucer" sect and
Myung Moon's Unification Church support ID, along with some
conservative Christians. We cannot know if the ID designer only
worked in the past or is still at it. Nor can we know what the
designer does. Therefore, ID can't be tested by the methods of
science. ID is not a research program.
"Supernatural science" doesn't work. "The designer did it" tells
us nothing about, say, bacterial resistance to antibiotics or
the record of life on earth. Invoking the designer will even
prevent asking answerable questions.
First enunciated by a clergyman in 1803, ID is really just two
assertions: The complexity of life is improbable and at some
level, the components of living things had to be made all at
once in order to work. But after-the-fact probabilities are like
telling the lottery winner it didn't happen because the odds of
winning were too small. Proteins are specific and complex, but
viruses and bacteria, under selection pressure, have fabricated
new proteins acting against drugs found nowhere in nature. The
development of integrated biochemical systems like that involved
in blood clotting is explicable through gene duplication from
simpler systems.
Promoters of ID have shifted the question of why it should be
taught to an argument about fairness. Controversies within
science abound, but ID isn't science. Fringe ideas face hurdles
in gaining acceptance and entry into textbooks. Unconventional
ideas like continental drift can become mainstream, but only
after thorough testing by the methods of science.
Intelligent design seeks to short circuit this process with PR
and political friends. A science teacher would have a hard time
explaining to confused students how to make the scientific
method work with supernatural forces, but ID could be taught in
a course on "new age" religions.
An unknowable designer who does unknowable things is not useful
to either faith or science.
John Davis of Jackson is a research entomologist and retired
science educator. E-mail: zygo at jam.rr.com.
[Thanks to Stuart Miller of http://www.uforeview.net for the lead]
--
"Only a zit on the wart on the heinie of progress." Copyright 1992, Frank Rice
Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1 at mindspring.com >
Alternate: < fortean1 at msn.com >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: * Fortean Times * Mystic's Haven * TLCB *
U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program
------------
Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List
TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org >
[Southeast Asia/Secret War in Laos veterans, Allies, CIA/NSA,
and "steenkeen" contractors are welcome.]
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list