[extropy-chat] Impeachment of President Bush What odds am I offered?

Mike Hayes l4point at gmail.com
Sat Dec 24 02:08:42 UTC 2005


On 12/23/05, Brent Neal <brentn at freeshell.org > wrote:
>
> (12/23/05 16:49) David Lubkin <extropy at unreasonable.com> wrote:
>
> >Brent wrote:
> >
> >> >Read this please.
> >>
> >> > http://www.nationalreview.com/pdf/12%2022%2005%20NSA%20letter.pdf
> >>
> >>Read this please. It carries about as much weight as the letter you
> reference.
> >>
> >>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122202119.html
> >
> >That's like claiming that an article in Newsweek carries as much
> >weight as a paper in Lancet.
>
>
> Then you clearly didn't read the article.
>
> A Justice Department that has a record of dubious interpretation of the
> law writes a formal letter.  A Senator who was involved in the passage of
> the law referenced says, "No, we explicitly left that authority out."  A
> quick check confirms that the section reads as he stated.  That seems like a
> no-brainer to me.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122201102.html


"The braying herds have already concluded, Tenet-like, that the president's
actions were slam-dunk illegal. It takes a superior mix of partisanship,
animus and ignorance to say that. "
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20051223/035605a9/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list