[extropy-chat] over the river and thru the woods...
David Lubkin
extropy at unreasonable.com
Sat Dec 24 17:10:45 UTC 2005
Spike wrote:
>Of course this did have its drawbacks. Cars occasionally hit
>large immobile objects or objects hurtling the opposite
>direction, at which time the larvae would go thru the
>windshield and become protoplasm projectiles, possibly
>striking innocent bystanders. Actual people could be
>injured or seriously killed.
Last study I saw said that seat belts in rear seats were of marginal
value. The larvae don't go through the windshield; they hit the rear
of the front seats and stop. I think the study was based on accident reports.
When *I* was a kid, I loved the "way back", which would have put two
rows of seats between me and the windshield. Being claustrophilic, I
also loved the floor area between the rear and front seats, as did my
dog. In that space, a crash would have been even less significant.
And, of course, the cars all had an acre of steel surrounding the passengers.
I understand that as boomers have acquired wealth and nostalgia,
those cars -- Dodge Dart, Plymouth Fury, etc. -- have become
collectables. At least I still have my baseball cards from the 60's
to retire on.
>Dad: Hey kids! Who wants to go to grandma's house?
>
>Larvae, in unison: Noooooooooooooo!...
Except now people buy DVD players for their cars to entertain the
young'uns. Even my sister who doesn't watch tv.
-- David.
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list