[extropy-chat] Bloodless Redistribution of Wealth(wasSingulartarians)
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Thu Dec 29 10:59:33 UTC 2005
On Dec 28, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Damien Broderick wrote:
> At 01:43 PM 12/28/2005 -0800, spike wrote:
>
>> Wealth creates wealth. Large piles of wealth in
>> the hands of an individual creates larger piles
>> of wealth. Wealth in the hands of government, well
>> I'll let you decide if that is a harm or a
>> benefit. Perhaps both....
>
> This is too simplistic to be useful. We need to look closely at the
> fine grain of how this aggregated wealth is spent by govt to know
> if it's better or worse than having it dispersed among many or
> aggregated by private owners (cf. national health in Oz and Canada
> vs. private funds in USA, where the latter notoriously have
> ludicrously excessive skimming from the top, pushing up costs).
Let's see. In the US the government takes 50% of everything
including land. Even with all that wealth it provides paltry
services (if we can even call many agencies and programs a "service")
and has racked up around $40 trillion of total indebtedness. I
would say the case against government confiscation of wealth and good
stewardship of wealth is pretty open and shut.
- samantha
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list