[extropy-chat] FWD (IUFO) government employees are more equal than you

[Terry W. Colvin]

Social Security Spooks 

by Walter E. Williams 

Walter E. Williams is chairman of the Economics Department at George Mason
University and a Cato Institute adjunct scholar. 

Liberal Democrats in Congress and Bill Clinton love to attack Republican
proposals for Social Security reform. In their quest for votes, they stoke the
fears of older Americans by telling them that Republicans want to destroy Social
Security by allowing Americans choices in providing for retirement. Most
Democrats and some Republicans rank Social Security with God, motherhood and
apple pie. 

Few people know that about 5 million Americans employed by state and municipal
governments do not pay into Social Security. Under the provisions of the 1935
Social Security Act, state and municipal governments could opt out. This Social
Security loophole was closed in 1983; however, Congress permitted those 5
million employees, as well as about 100,000 clergy, to remain exempt from paying
into Social Security. 

Part of President Clinton's plan to "save" Social Security, and championed by
Sen. John Breaux, Louisiana Democrat, is to force previously exempted employees
into Social Security. If 5 million more workers are forced into the system, it
would bring in an estimated $11 billion over five years. Instead of Social
Security collapsing in 2030, it would collapse in 2032 and there'd be 5 million
more Social Security obligations. Mr. Clinton and Mr. Breaux's proposal is
standard for any Ponzi scheme - to keep the scheme going, you have to round up
more participants. 

Last April, 12 senators, including five Democrats - Dianne Feinstein and Barbara
Boxer, both of California; Christopher Dodd of Connecticut; Richard Durbin of
Illinois; and Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts - descended on the White House to
demand President Clinton not support forcing 5 million of their constituents
into Social Security. They warned of the adverse impact on employees in terms of
lower rates of return and lost flexibility. 

J.T. Young, chief economist for the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee,
points out a real-life example of the inferiority of Social Security compared to
municipal pensions. San Diego city employees are required to put at least 3
percent of their salary into a pension plan (and may contribute up to 7
percent). Say a worker with a constant salary of $32,000 puts a minimum of 3
percent of his salary into a defined-contribution plan that goes into a mutual
fund paying an annual rate of 7 percent. Upon retirement, that worker will have
$293,385 in constant dollars. Such a return is far superior to Social Security's
zero to 2.5 percent rate of return. 

If currently exempt workers are forced into Social Security, they'd also lose
the flexibility of their municipal pension plans. Municipal pension plans
typically award partial benefits for partial disability. Social Security
provides benefits only when the individual becomes totally unemployable. People
in high-pressure jobs like police and firefighting sometime require early
retirement. Under Social Security, retirement benefits are not available until
age 62. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why municipal employees
don't want to be in Social Security. 

But what are we to make of Democrats who criticize Republicans for proposals
that would begin the process of allowing American workers to find a deal better
than Social Security while at the same time fighting to keep their 5 million
constituents from being dragged into the Social Security rat hole? At best,
they're a little more than forked-tongue scoundrels. 

When politicians boast to you about the wonders of Social Security, you should
ask them: "If Social Security is so wonderful, how come people have to be pulled
kicking and screaming into it? If it's so wonderful how come you're petitioning
Clinton to spare your municipal employee constituents from being pulled into
it?" I bet they will fork you gibberish for answers.


This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
http://www.printcharger.com/emailStripper.htm


-- 
"Only a zit on the wart on the heinie of progress." Copyright 1992, Frank Rice


Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1 at mindspring.com >
     Alternate: < fortean1 at msn.com >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: * Fortean Times * Mystic's Haven * TLCB *
      U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program
------------
Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List
   TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org > [Southeast Asia
veterans, Allies, CIA/NSA, and "steenkeen" contractors are welcome.]