[extropy-chat] Bill Moyers' Comments - Debunked
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Wed Feb 9 19:02:44 UTC 2005
On Feb 9, 2005, at 2:51 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:43:25AM -0800, Samantha Atkins wrote:
>
>> Are you sure this is what we voted for? Are you vetting the last
>
> Yes. Nobody contested the vote. It look as if a small majority (i.e.
> trees
> and shrubs voting vor Bush) voted for this administration. No
> secession, no
> armed uprise, no emigration. Yep, you voted for them.
That is not a remotely reasonable attitude. Besides the ones I voted
for and support did contest the election. There is more than a little
blaming the victims here. Secession or armed uprising at this time
would simply result in a lot of dead or imprisoned people more o your
liking and an even more draconian state. I don't know what you are up
to with this line but frankly it sucks big time.
>
>> election? Do any people really deserve destruction at the hands of
>> their supposed servants? Do those within and without the US who did
>
> Is that a rhetorical question? If no, I see exactly zero unrest, and
> people
> marching on the streets. Yes, you have the government you deserve.
I am done with this conversation until you start speaking with some
balance again.
>
>> not vote for this also deserve whatever hell it turns out to be?
>
> I think at this stage of the game it is obvious that the only
> countries that
> are safe are those with credible deterrence potential.
>
> Unfortunately, the EU is too slow to realize that, and start investing
> in a
> nuclear umbrella (teaming up with Russia would seem like a good idea),
> as
> well as the ability to protect its assets in orbit and/or be able to
> terminate enemy assets.
>
>
So by your logic the EU deserves what it gets unless they and other
countries gang up and attack the US?
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list