[extropy-chat] so is America fascist yet?

[Samantha Atkins]

In terms of being less dangerous to the world at large and more checked 
by the people and various other factors, Yes, they are both in that 
sense "better".    I also doubt either of them kowtow to or are under 
the influence of fundamentalists.

Beside, who is "better" than whom is hardly the point.

- samantha

On Jan 27, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Mike Lorrey wrote:

> You think Schroeder or Chirac are any better?
>
> --- Hubert Mania <humania at t-online.de> wrote:
>
>> I said:
>>
>>>> I could easily add another vicious rant against Bush and neocon
>> politics,
>> and why sympathy for this kind
>>>> of politics is incompatible with even the lowest definition of
>> transhumanism as I understand it.
>>
>> Eric Starck said:
>>
>>> I hardly think the other party would be more suited for the
>> transhumanist
>> agenda.
>>
>> I was not refering to the Democratic Party but to transhumanists on
>> this
>> list who explicitely support the politics of GWBush.
>>
>> humania
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>>
>
>
> =====
> Mike Lorrey
> Vice-Chair, 2nd District, Libertarian Party of NH
> "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
> It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
>                                       -William Pitt (1759-1806)
> Blog: http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=Sadomikeyism
>
>
> 		
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat