[extropy-chat] cosmic dust or cosmic bulldust?

[Dirk Bruere]

Mike Lorrey wrote:

>--- Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Sounds three degrees of separation from Velikovsky to me, but hey, it
>>came 
>>to my notice in a supportive comment from a Nobel physicist:
>>
>>http://www.etheric.com/Sphinx_Stargate/Scorpius.html
>>
>>The author, Dr Paul LaViolette, claims censorship from arXiv,
>>
>>http://www.etheric.com/physarchive/history2.html
>>
>>although this did finally appear there:
>>
>>http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0502019
>>    
>>
>
>It appeared in the general physics section, not astrophysics, not
>astronomy, etc. i.e. by banishing a topic-specific paper to the general
>physics area that it has nothing to do with, Cornell ensures that
>LaViolette's work does not get read as much as it should or could. The
>pattern of behavior by arxiv seems clear. Cornell has gone far downhill
>since Feynman's day. Perhaps that is why he went to California in the
>first place.
>
>  
>
I hear that Brian Josephson has complained of being effectively banned 
from posting to it because the mods don't like what he's saying.
Only the opinions of approved Nobel Prize winners are deemed worthy...

-- 
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.10/24 - Release Date: 21/06/2005