[extropy-chat] unidirectional thrust
Mike Lorrey
mlorrey at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 16 19:31:30 UTC 2005
Yes it would. He is also using bogus high thrust numbers and several
other errors that come from the fact he is hopelessly stuck in a
Newtonian mind frame (along with his fascist politics).
--- Christopher Healey <CHealey at unicom-inc.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't relativistic mass increase negate constant acceleration, and
> asymptotically vanish acceleration toward zero?
>
> > Dirk Bruere wrote:
> >
> >
> > You are simply wrong on that one, and others agree with me.
> > Show us the calculations as to how constant enery input producing
> > constant thrust, hence constant accel does *not* lead to over
> unity.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>
Mike Lorrey
Vice-Chair, 2nd District, Libertarian Party of NH
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
-William Pitt (1759-1806)
Blog: http://intlib.blogspot.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list