[extropy-chat] unidirectional thrust

Mike Lorrey mlorrey at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 16 19:31:30 UTC 2005


Yes it would. He is also using bogus high thrust numbers and several
other errors that come from the fact he is hopelessly stuck in a
Newtonian mind frame (along with his fascist politics).

--- Christopher Healey <CHealey at unicom-inc.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't relativistic mass increase negate constant acceleration, and
> asymptotically vanish acceleration toward zero?
> 
> > Dirk Bruere wrote:
> > 
> >
> > You are simply wrong on that one, and others agree with me.
> > Show us the calculations as to how constant enery input producing 
> > constant thrust, hence constant accel does *not* lead to over
> unity.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
> 

Mike Lorrey
Vice-Chair, 2nd District, Libertarian Party of NH
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
                                      -William Pitt (1759-1806) 
Blog: http://intlib.blogspot.com


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list