[extropy-chat] Re: Moral Relativism

Dirk Bruere dirk at neopax.com
Tue May 10 23:03:55 UTC 2005

Damien Broderick wrote:

> At 11:16 PM 5/10/2005 +0100, ben wrote:
>> It's quite amusing how my original hypothetical scenario is being 
>> pulled in all sorts of directions, and is being subjected to various 
>> interpretations.
>> ...
>> Just to clear a couple of points up: The pregnancy is detected at a 
>> very early stage, i didn't say Sue was raped, (although i didn't say 
>> she wasn't, either)
> A 14-year-old is not legally able to give consent to sexual 
> intercourse, even if she agrees to it. Legally, therefore, if she is 
> pregnant, she's been raped. Even if the pregnancy has been induced by 
> evil IVF scientists or UFO Grays conducting their vile implants.
Depends which nation all this happens in.


The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 10/05/2005

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list