[extropy-chat] Bioethics Essay- Revised
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Tue May 24 01:51:14 UTC 2005
On May 23, 2005, at 5:59 PM, The Avantguardian wrote:
>>
>
> The two theological doctrines that make up the meat of
> that part of my argument are The Immaculate Conception
> and the Infallibility of God. The second I don't
> explicitly mention by I do allude to. Do you think it
> would bolster my argument to explicitly mention the
> Infallibility of God?
>
>
I think you have no business basing an argument on either of these
premises. To do so is to wander into the Den of Eternal Soulless
Theological Debate as an innocent fool as it were. There is nothing
you could possibly win by doing this. Where did the Infallibility
of God come from anyway? It says plain as day in Genesis that God
regretted creating man. The Immaculate conception is a Catholic
myth. It isn't even important to many Protestants except as
supposedly fulfilling a mistranslation of some Old Testament prophecy.
- samantha
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list