[extropy-chat] FWD (SK) New entries for SKEPTIC Bibliography (creationism)
Terry W. Colvin
fortean1 at mindspring.com
Thu Nov 17 19:44:06 UTC 2005
http://www.csicop.org/bib/694
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
The Evolution Hoax Exposed
A. N. Field
1971, Tan; 104p. (Original: Why Colleges Breed Communists, 1941)
creationism:defense, creationism:history
An old (1941) creationist book that is interesting primarily
because it gives a British rather than US-based anti-evolutionary
view, and because it illustrates how little the "debate" between
creationists and scientists have changed. Field gives a little of
everything: selected scientific quotations against evolution,
accusations of fraud, proofs that evolution is nothing but anti-
Christian ideology, etc. etc. An interesting historical document.
http://www.csicop.org/bib/695
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
By Design: Science and the Search for God
Larry Witham
http://www.encounterbooks.com/books/byde/bydep.html
2003, Encounter; vii+248p.
creationism:defense, religion:defense
Witham, a journalist, argues that science and religion are
coming closer together. This is happening, apprently, because
scientists in many fields are finding suggestions of divine design in
the universe: in cosmology, the complexity and evolution of life,
explorations of the mind and brain, and attempts to explain human
spiritual life. Witham focuses on two main ways religious scientists
and theologians have been supporting intuitions of design. One is the
softer, more liberal approach, which is characterized by institutions
such as the Templeton Foundation that try and make room for religion
in science by promoting spirit- friendly interpretations of science.
The other is the harder-edged approach of intelligent design
proponents, who demand a revolution in science by proposing to
overturn Darwinian explanations. Witham's characterization of the
current state of science is inaccurate at best; the intellectual
currents he describes remain marginal to science. Nevertheless,
bringing science and religion together in dialogue is an attractive
enterprise now, finding much popular and wider cultural support.
Witham's book is a valuable survey of the self- perception of
religious scientists and theologians who believe they are making
progress.
http://www.csicop.org/bib/696
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
The Wedge Of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism
Phillip E. Johnson
http://ivpress.gospelcom.net/cgi-ivpress/book.pl/code=2395
2000, InterVarsity; 192p.
creationism:defense, religion:defense
Another Phillip Johnson book on intelligent design and the
evils of naturalism. It includes some clear and valuable discussions
of the main preoccupations of intelligent design: the nature of mind
and of information as much as biological evolution. Johnson places
intelligent design in an explicity religious context, presenting it
as a device to destroy naturalism and its pernicious influence in
intellectual life. This, also, helps make sense of intelligent design
by clarifying the broader concerns that drive the intelligent design
movement. So, even if it is scientifically just about worthless, this
is a valuable book that skeptics can learn a lot from.
http://www.csicop.org/bib/697
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Darwin's Proof: The Triumph of Religion over Science
Cornelius G. Hunter
http://www.brazospress.com/
2003, Brazos; 168p.
creationism:defense, religion:defense
An interesting book that falls in between the intelligent
design and straight-creationist genres of anti-evolutionary
literature. Hunter presents what he thinks are potent scientific
arguments against evolution; many of these are variations on typical
anti-evolutionary themes, though he emphasizes the complexity of
molecular biology, in keeping with the more recent intelligent design
style. More interesting are Hunter's excursions into philosophical
and theological reasons to oppose evolution and support creation,
including the parts where he accuses evolutionists of strongly
relying on bad theological arguments to support evolution. Hunter may
be partially correct: popular arguments for evolution do rely too
much on intuitions of "bad design" in order to bring creationism into
question. Still, that is hardly a fatal flaw in evolutionary science.
http://www.csicop.org/bib/698
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Strange Creations: Aberrant Ideas of Human Origins from Ancient
Astronauts to Aquatic Apes
Donna Koss
http://feralhouse.com/titles/kulchur/strange_creations.php
2001, Feral House; x+253p., illustrated
crankery, creationism, creationism:history, newage, religion, UFO
A fascinating book, covering strange views of human origins.
Creationism and allied beliefs is one of its main themes, but Kossy
also brings in ideas from the UFO subculture about alien
interventions at the dawn of humanity, notions of human degeneration
over time, racist theories of origins, eugenics, and the Urantia
book. She even discusses the Elaine Morgan's "aquatic ape" theory as
a scientifically weak but popular view. Kossy's approach is skeptical
but lighthanded; the book is more an entertaining guided tour through
various forms of weirdness than a quasi-academic analysis. Even
seasoned skeptics will likely come across some new notions, and the
less expert can get a good introduction of the subjects with useful
pointers to more in-depth material.
[ All reviewed by Taner Edis, bibliographer at csicop.org ]
Visit the full bibliography at http://www.csicop.org/bibliography/
Please consider submitting an entry yourself.
Taner Edis, SKEPTIC bibliographer
--
"Only a zit on the wart on the heinie of progress." Copyright 1992, Frank Rice
Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1 at mindspring.com >
Alternate: < fortean1 at msn.com >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: * Fortean Times * Mystic's Haven * TLCB *
U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program
------------
Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List
TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org >
[Southeast Asia/Secret War in Laos veterans, Allies, CIA/NSA,
and "steenkeen" contractors are welcome.]
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list