[extropy-chat] against ID

[Alfio Puglisi]

On 11/19/05, Harvey Newstrom <mail at harveynewstrom.com> wrote:
>
> Many can and do argue that we must at
> least consider the possibility that we are living inside a simulation
> created by some intelligent design.  How this differs from ID, I don't
> see.

It differs because the simulation argument doesn't says that the
designer is some mysterious supernatural entity, but is more probably
some green giant-sized insect, who lives in an universe at least
complex as our own, to which the simulation argument also applies.

Alfio