[extropy-chat] against ID

[Eugen Leitl]

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:06:29AM +1100, Brett Paatsch wrote:

> I think Harvey makes a good point. 

So do I.
 
> Eugen, aren't you conflating creationism with numerology? On your sliding
> scale of belief, exactly how strong is strong? 

I have no idea what you're talking about. 
 
> Or does the word "strong" relate not to the belief (which is binary one 

Why should belief be boolean?

> either has it or doesn't) but to the SA like say hard relates to a "hard
> takeoff"?

There's zero evidence for SA.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20051119/bda8f107/attachment.bin>