[extropy-chat] FWD [forteana] Re: Are dwarfs better forlongduration spaceflight?]
Adrian Tymes
wingcat at pacbell.net
Tue Sep 6 21:27:23 UTC 2005
--- Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> Nuclear power in space is a very hard sell politically.
Not as hard as selling a dwarf-only mission.
> The technology doesn't exist yet in the first place, and needs
> to be developed and tested.
Development and testing are needed, but it does exist. Then again,
dev & test are needed for this mission anyway: there does not presently
exist a rocket capable of sustaining one human life, even a dwarf's,
while going to Mars and returning under its own power.
> Nuke-powered ion/plasma drive would be probably an optimal
> combination even for manned flight. It would be easier to
> assemble and fuel up the craft in orbit, and go chemical
> all the way, with a minimum-mass crew module (with robots
> sent ahead preparing the habitat, and the fuel still) by
> remote control.
Easier in some respects, harder in others. The more money and
resources a project requires, the harder it inherently is: you have to
spend effort to gain said money and resources. I suspect this may be
part of what you overlooked.
> > The scaling factor of different propulsion systems trumps the
> > difference in crew dimensions. For example: calculate how much
> rocket
> > you would need to make the trip in a few months (one way) on
> hydrazine.
>
> What is wrong with using cryogenic fuel, e.g. methane/oxygen?
*shrugs* Nothing, for the sake of this discussion. Just pick a fuel
so you can work the numbers. Nuclear/ion propulsion beats any chemcal
fuel by a sufficiently large margin that focusing the finite dev/test
resources on that, rather than spending effort on minimizing the crew
(and taking the resulting benefits), will achieve optimal payoffs.
(Remember, any mission always has a finite budget. Some potentially
marginally beneficial ideas almost always have to tossed to the side in
order to focus on the best paying off ideas. The marginal and very
mission-specific payoffs from the dwarf proposal would seem to be an
example of this.)
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list