[extropy-chat] Name that system

[Thomas]

Jef Allbright wrote:

>>pjmanney wrote:
>>    
>>
>>[ . . . ] massive schisms in society and will redefine what society is. [ . . . ] until we find a way to achieve a 
>>socially viable balance.  [ . . . ]
>>    
>>
>
>I think this is a key point [ . . . ] a *shared*
>appreciation of the importance of *diversity* as essential to our
>*common* growth.
>
>* [ . . . ] having equal worth, or immeasurable worth -- [ . . . ] ignores significant differences.
>
>* [ . . . ] having the right to do one's own thing [ . . . ] ignores
>significant commonalities.
>
>So few of us today see human society as an ecology, where one's
>intentional growth is based on effective awareness of a complex system
>of both competition and cooperation.
>
>Fortunately, as the Times article highlights, such awareness tends to
>emerge because it works.  But will it fly high enough and far enough
>just to meet our basic needs as primates who enjoy being entertained, or
>will we recognize and grasp it as a powerful and general tool of
>effective decision-making?
>
>- Jef
>
This sounds very encouraging to me.  Now if, as PJ Manney said, 
"Hierarchical power is out,"[1] then what is the unmuddled concept of 
the organizational scheme for this complex ecosystem?  Does it supercede 
democracy or is it a new form?  Is this some virtual republic?  Are 
"online people power" or "Web 2.0"  names that enable a grasp of this 
power tool?   Perhaps more of us could see it and use it to achieve 
better "cognitive enhancement"[2]  and "effective decision making"[3] if 
it had a coherant descriptive title -- and maybe a little handbook.  -- 
 Thomas

1. This list at 7:04 pm yesterday
2. Anders Sandberg, this list, 1:35 am
3. Jef Albright, above
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20061218/570d70d3/attachment.html>