[extropy-chat] FWD (UFO UpDate) A Peck Of Nanotech
Terry W. Colvin
fortean1 at mindspring.com
Thu Jan 19 02:42:39 UTC 2006
[Partial woo-woo alert! -Terry]
From: Bob Soetebier <xxxx.xxx>
To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates at virtuallystrange.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:45:19 -0600
Subject: A Peck Of Nanotech
Because of the obviously advanced technology involved -
exhibited via "impossible" high-speed maneuvers and other high-
tech attributes - some have speculated that Alien intelligence
certainly would have long ago mastered advances in atomic-level
miniaturization. In other words: Nanotechnology.
My interest in nanotechnology began around 1990. That is when I
first read about fullerine and 'Bucky Balls' (named to honor
former St. Louisan Buckminster Fuller, the inventor of the
geodesic dome), along with the development of carbon
nanotubules.
Many consider nanotechnology "science fiction" - if they have
heard or read about it all. Nanotech holds great promise and is
already being implemented in various fields, including
electronics and medicine, among others.
(For some examples of current nanotech in use in everyday
products, you can read a Tues., Jan. 3, 2006, St. Louis Post-
Dispatch 'Op-Ed' piece, by Julia A. Moore and Daniel Ray -
entitled, SCIENCE: Super-tiny 'machines' are already at work -
at the following URL.):
http://tinyurl.com/8oyx2
At the same time, the potential threat posed by unrestrained
nanotech 'in the wild' is a very real possibility! For those who
might discount some of the hazard warnings, please consider the
following from a September 24, 2002 PC Magazine article
entitled Nanotech Hazards?, by Sebastian Rupley:
... The National Science Foundation predicts that within ten
years the entire semiconductor industry will rely on
nanotechnology and nanomaterials. But according to some new
reports, there may be hazards in toying with Mother Nature's
building blocks.
At a meeting held by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) this past spring, researchers reported that nanoparticles
(bits of material engineered at nanoscale) have already appeared
in the livers of research animals and may eventually piggyback
on bacteria and enter the food chain. That report was followed
by a warning from the ETC Group, an organization focused on
technology's risk to the environment, criticizing the fact that
there is no regulatory body tracking nanomaterials.
While keeping that above reference to "bacteria" in mind,
consider the following predictive info that was contained in an
April 2000 "Wired" magazine article entitled "Why The Future
Doesn't Need Us" by Bill Joy. Regarding nanotech developments,
Bill Joy quotes Eric Drexler (author of the book, Engines of
Creation) thusly:
As Drexler explained:
"Plants" with 'leaves' no more efficient than today's solar
cells could out-compete real plants, crowding the biosphere with
an inedible foliage. Tough omnivorous 'bacteria' could out-
compete real bacteria: They could spread like blowing pollen,
replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter
of days. Dangerous replicators could easily be too tough, small,
and rapidly spreading to stop - at least if we make no
preparation. We have trouble enough controlling viruses and
fruit flies.
Among the cognoscenti of nanotechnology, this threat has become
known as the 'gray goo problem'. Though masses of uncontrolled
replicators need not be gray or gooey, the term 'gray goo'
emphasizes that replicators able to obliterate life might be
less inspiring than a single species of crabgrass. They might be
superior in an evolutionary sense, but this need not make them
valuable.
The gray goo threat makes one thing perfectly clear: We cannot
afford certain kinds of accidents with replicating assemblers.
Gray goo would surely be a depressing ending to our human
adventure on Earth, far worse than mere fire or ice, and one that
could stem from a simple laboratory accident.
Considering recent incidents of the escaping into the wild of
unintentionally - but, not necessarily unpredictable -
'bio-engineered' herbicide-resistant weeds, no one can any longer
doubt the threat of such man-made negligence. Everyone should be
concerned of the gravely serious hazard posed by 'in-the-wild
nanoparticles'!
Bob Soetebier
--
"Only a zit on the wart on the heinie of progress." Copyright 1992, Frank Rice
Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1 at mindspring.com >
Alternate: < fortean1 at msn.com >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: * Fortean Times * Mystic's Haven * TLCB *
U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program
------------
Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List
TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org >
[Southeast Asia/Secret War in Laos veterans, Allies, CIA/NSA,
and "steenkeen" contractors are welcome.]
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list