Faith-based thought vs thinkers Re: [extropy-chat]IntelligentDesign: I'm not dead yet

christopher hershey zenkai001 at sbcglobal.net
Mon Jan 30 18:14:49 UTC 2006


you have gotten the wrong address, cause i never asked you a question
   
  and i dont know who you are.

Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote:
  On 1/30/06, Brett Paatsch <bpaatsch at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
      By not answering the question I asked you are making it difficult to communicate with you.
  
I was trying to, but maybe I didn't do a good job of it; I'll try again. 


    I was trying to find out what *you* meant by "faith" remember? 
  
Okay, I'll define it as belief in the absence of evidence.


    I wondered if you were defending some right of religious people to be "faith-based thinkers" perhaps because you were yourself a religious person or if instead your objection was coming from a different place.  
  
Different place; I have no belief in God or the supernatural. Nor do I suggest that faith can replace reason in science, law or philosophy. But nor can reason entirely replace faith. Reason can tell you that B follows from A, but it can't tell you whether to believe A in the first place; the chain has to start somewhere.

I'm not a religious man, but I believe in love and life and laughter. I believe in beauty and truth and goodness, and I believe these things are worth protecting, even though neither I nor anyone else can prove it; at some point I, like any civilized man, must resort to belief in the absence of evidence; for people who don't believe in beauty produce ugliness; people who don't believe in truth produce falsehood; and people who don't believe in good produce evil.


And if I were to draw a dividing line in the sands of philosophy and choose one side to make a stand against the other, I wouldn't draw it between those who believe in God and those who do not. I would draw it between those who believe in beauty and truth and goodness - whether or not God is part of their belief system - and those who do not.

Does that answer your question?

- Russell

_______________________________________________
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20060130/9df3400b/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list