[extropy-chat] Spanish Socialists considergivingapeshuman-level rights
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Mon May 1 20:39:30 UTC 2006
On Apr 30, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Hughes, James J. wrote:
>> Samantha Atkins wrote:
>>> No, it doesn't. The ape is not a human being or a human
>> child. The
>>> "logic" depends on a spurious analogy being accepted.
>
> Samantha,
>
> We apparently have different understandings of transhumanist
> ethics. For
> me "that's not a human being" doesn't tell me anything about its moral
> status. Apparently it does for you.
>
My comments are not about denying "moral status" to non-humans but
the anthropomorphism of treating quite different species more or less
as if they are the same when start considering and attempting to
respect non-human species moral status.
- samantha
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list