[extropy-chat] Hard TakeOff [was: Bluff and the Darwin award]
Robin Hanson
rhanson at gmu.edu
Sat May 20 16:15:32 UTC 2006
On 5/16/2006, Russell Wallace wrote:
>Hard takeoff = a process by which seed AI (of complexity buildable
>by a team of very smart humans in a basement) undertakes
>self-improvement to increase its intelligence, without needing mole
>quantities of computronium, _without needing to interact with the
>real world outside its basement_, and without needing a long time;
>subsequently emerging in a form that is already superintelligent. ...
>2) Recursive self-improvement mightn't be a valid concept in the first place.
I never saw a response to this. I'm a skeptic of the hard takeoff
scenario myself - while it is logically possible, I am disappointed
by the attention it gets relative to more likely scenarios. The
complaint that such a seed wouldn't have a "real world environment"
seems a bit misstated though. In any system with parts, each part
has a real environment composed of the other parts. The Earth has
been a largely self-contained system that has experienced great
self-improvement. My skepticism is instead based on the observation
that effective autarky is rare (http://hanson.gmu.edu/dreamautarky.html).
Robin Hanson rhanson at gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
Associate Professor of Economics, George Mason University
MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444
703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list