[extropy-chat] SEX! (Re: Martine Rothblatt and bemes)
Keith Henson
hkhenson at rogers.com
Fri Nov 10 18:12:07 UTC 2006
At 11:27 PM 11/9/2006 +0100, Anders wrote:
snip
> Already memes
>are problematic as replicators since they are hard to delineate from
>surrounding cognitive structures,
Hi Anders
In my opinion, the only logical way to consider memes is as pure
information. True, they have to be in a brain to have effects, just like a
gene has to be in a cell or a computer virus has to be in a computer.
But the essence of a meme is the information.
So memes are replicating information patterns, elements of culture, ideas,
beliefs, etc, etc.
But it all comes down to the same thing, information measurable in bits.
I have been seriously annoyed at people who tried to mystify such a simple
subject. They distract from the really interesting interface between
evolutionary psychology and memetics which elucidates subjects as important
to humans as germ theory.
Keith Henson
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list