[extropy-chat] Rational thinking was Movie review- (2)
Keith Henson
hkhenson at rogers.com
Tue Nov 28 19:02:28 UTC 2006
At 05:46 AM 11/28/2006 -0500, Robert wrote:
snip
>I guess I should have put an emphasis on *rational* thought. Thoughts in
>and of themselves are relatively useless other than from the fact that
>they are the substrate that yields those which are ultimately
>valuable. Thoughts in general are like a gene pool. Applying the
>selection criteria "this is a good thought because everyone else believes
>it is a good thought" generally sucks. Applying the selection criteria
>"this is a good thought because it make logical sense and reality keeps
>demonstrating over and over and over again that it makes sense" is IMO a
>better approach.
Like everyone on this list, I value rational thoughts. But it is obvious
this is a minority viewpoint for the population in general.
Why?
Can anyone answer this from an evolutionary psychology point of view?
>I wouldn't give you the time of day for a useless thought. Aaahhh, but
>for those that are rational *and* useful, those I'd be willing to pay cold
>hard cash for.
Heh. What would the rational thought that explained irrational thinking be
worth?
Keith Henson
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list