[extropy-chat] Islamic morons win yet again
Chris Hibbert
hibbert at mydruthers.com
Mon Oct 2 17:33:08 UTC 2006
Damien cites "A learned friend" thusly:
> <What utter crap. Violence motivated by the desire to expel foreign invaders
> or colonizers, to restore the historical dominance of one ethnic or
> religious group or to establish a new structure of dominance, or to impose a
> particular set of religious rules--goals which are held by the various
> indigenous factions who are killing people in Iraq--is hardly "fighting for
> nothing in particular." There isn't one manifesto that fits everybody
> toting a gun or a bomb--there are a number of contending factions--but the
> fact that it can't all be summed up easily in this guy's PowerPoint
> presentation doesn't make it "aimless." Different participants have
> different aims. This is far from unusual--consider the various factions
> involved in the South African resistance.>
Eliezer's response was "Fair enough.", but I don't agree. In the South
African resistance, even though there were various factions and many
voices, one could easily hear over the general uproar a cry to stop the
policies that made the blacks second class citizens in their own native
country. Some wanted socialist solutions while others looked for tribal
solutions, some voices may have called for the death or expulsion of all
whites while others looked for a pluralist outcome, but a common
underlying theme was coherent.
In Iraq, when you can get official spokesmen or the results of credible
polling, there aren't any coherent themes. Sometimes you hear "all
westerners out", and other times "the Americans must stay until we can
stabilize our nation". Some call for a strict imposition of Sharia law,
others for a non-secular state.
But most important of all, the factions committing the violence, for the
most part, aren't talking at all. We don't hear anyone taking
responsibility for dropping 9 severed heads out of the back of a car,
for killing police recruits en masse, for killing worshipers in mosques
or people waiting in line to buy gas. They are killed and no message is
delivered. No actors are identified. No one takes responsibility and
says "until *our* demands are met, we will continue to make Iraq
unlivable". We don't know what the demands are, or who wants to be
appeased.
The people who talk in public (various clerics and politicians) don't
take responsibility for the violence. (They often refuse to denounce
it, but that doesn't tell us which factions are committing it.) This is
unlike South Africa. I can't think of another conflict in which the
aggrieved parties were so scattered, so violent, and so silent.
Chris
--
It is easy to turn an aquarium into fish soup, but not so
easy to turn fish soup back into an aquarium.
-- Lech Walesa on reverting to a market economy.
Chris Hibbert
hibbert at mydruthers.com
Blog: http://pancrit.org
http://zocalo.sourceforge.net Prediction Market Software
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list