[extropy-chat] Role of Observer is not Relevant
austriaaugust at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 2 21:51:33 UTC 2007
This should read/I'll add a little more:
Isn't it already mathematically established that any
number (for example: 9) is inherently a calculation*?*
And aren't calculations and computations identical
I haven't read this book yet - only the jacket at B&N,
but apparently the book "Decoding the Universe" argues
that any interactions whatsoever (for example between
particles) are inexorably linked-with/composed-of a
computation, regardless of whether or not that
interaction was observed.
--- A B <austriaaugust at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Isn't it already mathematically established that any
> number (for example: 9) is inherently a calculation.
> For example:
> 9 = 4 * 2 + 1
> 9 = 3 + 1 + 5
> But, maybe I'm wrong. I haven't yet studied number
> Best Wishes,
> Jeffrey Herrlich
> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> Download and play hundreds of games for free on
> Yahoo! Games.
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
More information about the extropy-chat