[extropy-chat] Best To Regard Free Will as Existing
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Fri Apr 6 05:06:47 UTC 2007
On Apr 5, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>
> On 4/6/07, Jef Allbright <jef at jefallbright.net> wrote:
>
> There's no paradox here folks, it's just about using the appropriate
> context. We have no problem at all describing the behavior of *other*
> agents in fully deterministic terms. It's only when we consider
> volition from our own point of view that we are seduced and overcome
> by the illusion that something special is going on.
>
> So you agree that free will consists only in the fact that we don't
> know what we're going to do until we do it?
>
> A digression: does God have free will? It would seem to be
> inconsistent with omniscience.
>
So now you want to talk about invisible unicorns? I rest my case
regarding the merits of this topic.
- samantha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20070405/116ddaa4/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list