[extropy-chat] "The problem is partly a matter of evolutionary psychology."
hkhenson at rogers.com
Sun Apr 8 04:37:05 UTC 2007
At 01:48 PM 4/7/2007 -0400, Robert wrote:
>On 4/7/07, Keith Henson <<mailto:hkhenson at rogers.com>hkhenson at rogers.com>
>>Patrick McKnight is a Rutgers College senior, majoring in philosophy and
>>sociology. His column "The View from Nowhere" runs on alternate Fridays.
>It isn't worth my time to take apart the article on a piece by piece
>basis. It is nice that he is thinking in terms of "sustainability" but
>the basis for many of the claims has significant flaws. Most importantly
>I would not expect a major in philosophy and sociology to have a grasp of
>what engineering and technology could accomplish given sufficient economic
>incentives (be they "natural" or artificial).
I didn't post it for the engineering insights, and didn't expect any. The
only really significant point is recognition by someone in a much younger
generation than mine that humans are poorly equipped by our evolutionary
history for "comprehending long-term threats" much less to take steps to
deal with problems of such time and physical scales.
It is, in my opinion, a bigger problem than energy and global warming
combined. Unlike that problem I don't have the least idea of how to solve
the problem of "comprehending long-term threats." If I did, I would solve
that first and it would be easy to get resources allocated to deal with
such problems as energy--not to mention even harder problems like avoiding
the creation of hostile AIs.
More information about the extropy-chat