[extropy-chat] Avoid Too Much Change.
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Wed Apr 11 19:34:38 UTC 2007
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:50:07PM +0100, Russell Wallace wrote:
> Selection? Look at the statistics: selection favors those who eschew
> this geek stuff completely. We're programmed to believe personal power
Tools are irrelevant?! Why are we exterminating the gorilla then, and
not gorilla us?
> confers selective advantage, because it was true in the conditions in
> which we evolved - but even though we still believe it because we're
> programmed to, it's no longer true.
It doesn't matter what we believe, the great fitness function evaluates
us all.
> As for why it's not worth considering: it's a story. We make up
> stories for ourselves for our own reasons. Sometimes we set them in
> "the future", but when the actual future comes around, it practically
> never resembles our stories; once you go beyond such predictions as
> "computers will be more powerful in ten years than they are today",
> futurology has a lower track record of success than you'd expect from
> random chance. As soon as someone says "the future will be like X",
> it's a reasonably safe bet that whatever the future actually ends up
> like, it won't be X.
"Evolution will still apply in future". That's completely reasonable,
and a powerful source of constraints.
> In this case it's not even a particularly plausible story: if you get
> "IQ 12000" (scare quotes because the phrase doesn't actually mean
> anything, IQ isn't defined much past 200 or so), are you going to go
> berserk and start massacring everyone? (That, after all, is what the
A diverse population of postbiological beings could very well be terminal
to conventional ecosystems. Pretending it never can be is not good risk
evaluation, given the magnitude of the outcome.
> elimination of other viewpoints in a timescale as short as a century
> implies.) Are you even going to tolerate such behavior in others? Even
Kiloyears are overnight wall clock.
> if you are, nobody else is. Nobody with any political power wants the
> existence of a handful of people a zillion times smarter than anyone
Not necessarily smarter, DIVERSE and FIT.
> else. The world isn't going to tolerate the creation or existence of
> superintelligent entities unless they behave like respectable
> citizens.
The world isn't a homogenous entity.
> "If we have matter duplicators, will each of us be a sovereign
> and possess a hydrogen bomb?" -- Jerry Pournelle
Of course. But just having a bunch of nukes doesn't make you a souvereign
in the posthuman world.
> Leaving aside the lack of evidence that matter duplicators are
> possible, stop and think about this for a moment: conventional
Do you have a problem with machine-phase? I'm all ears. Tell me why it
wouldn't work.
> manufacturing technology is perfectly adequate to build hydrogen
> bombs, has been for decades. Why are we not each a sovereign
Not in your cellar.
> possessing a hydrogen bomb today? Once you look at that question, it
> becomes clear that the "matter duplicators" are a smokescreen,
> something to aid suspension of disbelief by distracting the mind from
> the real-life reasons why this scenario doesn't happen.
You could build quite a few megatons in your cellar with machine-phase.
> For Pournelle is after all a storyteller: he has earned a living
He is a writer. We're not writers, selling some plausible claptrap is
incompatible with my training as a scientist.
> making up stories, which are selected in the marketplace based on the
> same fitness criterion: that people enjoy reading them. This is fine
> provided we understand that it is not at all related to the
> hypothetical fitness criterion of correspondence to what will actually
> happen in real life.
Real life defines fitness.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list