[extropy-chat] Changing Other Poster's Minds
thespike at satx.rr.com
Sun Apr 29 23:26:20 UTC 2007
At 10:25 AM 4/29/2007 -0700, Lee wrote:
>Likewise if someone demonstrated that ESP works.
That has been done sufficiently already.
> Why didn't evolution seize upon it?
Evolution probably did seize upon it.
>Why aren't the very gifted few already at work cleaining out
>the casinos in Las Vegas?
Why aren't really gifted card sharps and other grifters cleaning out casinos?
>What are the physical laws that account for it?
Good question, perhaps akin to: what, in 1900, were the known
physical laws that accounted for dark matter and energy and the
accelerated continuing expansion of the universe?
>Do ESP influences travel faster than light?
The question implies a model that might be inappropos. Certainly
there are observed correspondences between what seem to be
"responses" and what seem to be "stimuli" outside their lightcones.
>If so, what happens to relativity theory?
Good question. What happens to relativity theory with nonlocal
quantum connectivity? There are answers to the latter, but not
everyone is happy with them because they mostly look like dodges.
>And on and on and on. Back to square one all over again.
Not at all. Why? Did relativity take *everything* "back to square
one"? No, but it took some fancy dancing to accommodate earlier understandings.
More information about the extropy-chat