[ExI] Too many level shifts was Nature Hates a Vacuum

hkhenson hkhenson at rogers.com
Tue Dec 11 18:43:39 UTC 2007


At 08:31 AM 12/11/2007, Terry wrote:
>(keith wrote)
>"I can't see that breeding--in a pre contraceptive era--needed any
>religious support.  Generally humans populated whatever space they
>had to the maximum extent possible."
>
>Hi Keith, I think you "hit the nail's head" this time. Someone also
>said that "nature hates a vacuum." We are all part of nature with
>expanding memes to occupy whatever space we find in time. In the
>physical universe, energy expands according to the principle of
>thermodynamics.

To a very good approximation nature is *all* vacuum. That saying 
originated with experimenters at the bottom of a ocean of air in the 
days when leather flap valves were high tech.

Memes, in a way sort of analogous to genes, do spread into a 
population of susceptible hosts.  How the susceptibility of the hosts 
varies with time and the presence of other memes is a subject of 
considerable interest to me.

Trying to bring in thermodynamics is shifting too many levels in a 
discussion.  But then I might be overly sensitive to this as a result 
of some particularly bad experiences with people who should know 
where their competence ends supporting a subtile vandal on Wikipedia 
who was pushing his "human thermodynamic" theory.

Applying theory from one level more than a level away has to be done 
with great caution.  Here is my list of discussion levels.

memes (culture)
human biology and EP
rest of biology
chemistry
physics

Keith




More information about the extropy-chat mailing list