[ExI] $25,000 Matching Grant Fund Drive
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Wed Dec 19 07:10:40 UTC 2007
On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:26 PM, James Clement wrote:
> Samantha asked the following two questions:
>
> 1) What well funded opposition is that, the so-called "bio-
> ethicists" and
> their ilk?
>
> Among others (annual budget in parenthesis): Center for Bioethics
> and Human
> Dignity: $751,000 (2006); Center for Bioethics and Culture: $117,000
> (2006);
> Center for Genetics and Society: $923,000 (2006); Ethics and Public
> Policy
> Center (publishes New Atlantis): $1,900,000 (2006), and Discovery
> Institute:
> $3,000,000 (2006)
>
> 2) When WTA stops preaching socialism as the one true way toward an
> ethical
> transhumanist future I may donate. Have there been developments in
> that
> direction?
>
> As of the 2005 Survey (we're doing a new survey right now), 22% of
> the WTA
> members were Libertarian, 39% were socialist, and 16% were Other.
> The WTA
> has no official position regarding economic/political ideology - and
> individual Board members do not speak for the organization as a whole.
Official or not it was a very strong spin for much of its life. More
than spin there was an active hounding and denigration of those who
thought differently. The stats have been the same among the members
for years but that does not mean the organization has been politically
relatively neutral or balanced or even respectful of different
political views.
> If you want the WTA to represent YOUR views, the best way is to
> become a paid,
> participating member and vote in the Board Members of your choice.
> However,
> I'd like to think that we can all work together to spread our
> Transhumanist
> memes and learn to live with our differences.
I would like to think that too but that is not quite what I have seen
to date.
- samantha
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list