[ExI] Re-framing Innovation re Consciousness

[Natasha Vita-More]

At 08:43 PM 12/30/2007, you wrote:
>On Sunday 30 December 2007 20:55, Natasha Vita-More wrote:
> > This list has a high
> > comprehension level and all to often people waste time with
> > overwriting what could be done simply.
>
>I know I am guilty of this.  I think of a million subtle little points that I
>want to work into my response.  I try to cram them all in there, and end up
>with a verbose tome that is tedious to read.

And I am guilty of the opposite.  I produce typographical errors, 
fragmented sentences, and missing verbs and pronouns.  Often when I 
reread what I have written I am shocked in horror.  But I assume that 
you all know me and realize that I would not post if I didn't have 
something of some value to say while at the same time, handling a 
dozen other things.  Fortunately (or rather unfortunately) I have no 
grandchildren on my lap, but my animals and my rose garden nag me 
while I am working.  No excuses or regrets, just plan 'ole facts.

Natasha


<http://www.natasha.cc/>Natasha<http://www.natasha.cc/> Vita-More
PhD Candidate,  Planetary Collegium - CAiiA, situated in the Faculty 
of Technology,
School of Computing, Communications and Electronics,
University of Plymouth, UK
<http://www.transhumanist.biz/>Transhumanist Arts & Culture
<http://extropy.org/>Thinking About the <http://extropy.org/>Future

If you draw a circle in the sand and study only what's inside the 
circle, then that is a closed-system perspective. If you study what 
is inside the circle and everything outside the circle, then that is 
an open system perspective. - Buckminster Fuller


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20071230/70297c10/attachment.html>