[extropy-chat] Re-save the world

[kevinfreels.com]

OK. Bad example. I was more curious about rivers. I know that the levels of
the rivers vary according to precipitation, but since they empty into the
sea I was expecting them to show some kind of increase.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BillK" <pharos at gmail.com>
To: "ExI chat list" <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [extropy-chat] Re-save the world


> On 2/16/07, kevinfreels.com wrote:
> > Yeah, it's neat ALMOST what I am looking for. Thanks. I just keep
thinking
> > that the great lakes and the rivers would all be affected as well and
would
> > like to see that too. Is this the best there is? What I'm trying to
figure
> > out is where all the valuable real estate will be in 20-50 years.
> >
> >
>
>
> Your problem there is that the Great Lakes are waaaayyyy above sea-level.
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes>
>
> The height above sea level of the lake surfaces varies from Lake
> Superior's 602 ft (183 m) to Lake Ontario's 246 ft (75 m)
>
>
> BillK
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>