[ExI] "Up against the warming zealots"...hmmm

[samantha]

Michael Lawrence wrote:
> Anthropogenic global warming, as in enhanced greenhouse effect, can firstly be considered refuted due to the mismatch in fingerprinting between the predicted and actual atmospheric warming profile. 
Most scientists disagree with this.  Why? 

> Secondly, by the temperature responses on forcing not showing negative feedback characteristics, falsifying the alleged effect of positive feedbacks.
>
> That's it, projections and predictions false. Hypothesis falsified. Popper philosophy end of story. 
>   

Sorry but it is not that simple.