[extropy-chat] AI and the law already

[gts]

> but if AIs now need a license...

They don't.

I was going to comment about what a strange and remarkable legal decision  
this seems to be, but then I read the article and realized what should  
have been obvious: contrary to the headline and the words in the first  
paragraph, the judge did not actually rule that "the software was  
effectively practicing law without a license". The ruling was against the  
human seller of the computerized legal service, of course.

-gts