[extropy-chat] Fragmentation of computations
eugen at leitl.org
Tue Mar 27 15:30:50 UTC 2007
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:24:53PM +0100, Russell Wallace wrote:
> Indeed, but that doesn't contradict the timeless view - see my
> subsequent post where I point out why even to a Platonist like me, who
> is happy with the idea of an array of frames being conscious, it's
> still wrong to claim rocks are conscious.
I have no trouble with an a sequence of frames being conscious.
However, I don't see how e.g. a Hash Life can be validated,
without resorting to an explicit construction of subsequent
trajectory frames (spacetime plot in CA lingo).
The same applies to explicit enumeration.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat