[ExI] Kurzweil critique

[Vladimir Nesov]

Yes, this analogy occurred to me when I wrote that, still people like
to say that "we don't know what intelligence is, so how do you know
that this thing you engineered is as intelligent as humans?".

It's interesting what kind of papers would be possible to generate if
effort comparable to that of Loebner Prize competitors were to be
spent on such task... Chicken chicken.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk

On 11/6/07, Bryan Bishop <kanzure at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 15:53, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
> > 2a) probably there's a simpler architecture that results in
> > equivalently powerful functional result (like device being able to
> > generate scientific papers, like human scientists do), but which is
> > easier to engineer
>
> We already have stuff like the automatic comp sci paper generator:
> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/
>
> But that's a long shot from technically relevant scientific writing.
>
> - Bryan
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>


-- 
Vladimir Nesov                            mailto:robotact at gmail.com